ISP 121-502 Summer II 07-08: Class Evaluation

Was this course well organized?

Exceptionally organized

22.2%

11.1%

33.3%

Adequately organized

11.1%

Very poorly organized

N/A

Do you feel the course objectives were accomplished?

Closely follows objectives

33.3%

22.2%

11.1%

Adequate attention to objectives

11.1%

Little attention to objectives

N/A

The amount of work you performed outside of this course was:

Too much

11.1%

Adequate

22.2%

33.3%

22.2%

Quite small

11.1%

N/A

How difficult was the course material?

Challenging

11.1%

Moderately difficult

11.1%

33.3%

11.1%

Too easy

11.1%

N/A

The textbook for this course was:

Appropriate, interesting, significantly enhanced my understanding

11.1%

Moderately helpful, somewhat interesting, increased my understanding

Inappropriate and little help

N/A

88.9%

Supplementary reading for this course was:

Appropriate helpful

11.1%

Moderately helpful

11.1%

Inappropriate, dull little help in learning what was required for the course

N/A

77.8%

The assignments for the course were:

Fair, impartial, based on sufficient evidence

22.2%

33.3%

Reasonably fair, based on adequate evidence

11.1%

33.3%

Confusing, often made late, no relation to class work

N/A

The grading of homework and exams in this course was:

Fair, impartial, based on sufficient evidence

44.4%

22.2%

11.1%

Reasonably fair, based on adequate evidence

11.1%

Frequently partial and unfair, little evidence to justify grade

N/A

What is your overall estimate of this course?

One of the most interesting, informative, useful, personally helpful course

33.3%

11.1%

Average in interest, usefulness, etc.

33.3%

11.1%

One of the least interesting, uninformative, unuseful, personally unhelpful course

11.1%

N/A

How valuable was this course in terms of your technical development?

Extremely valuable

22.2%

11.1%

Reasonably valuable

11.1%

22.2%

11.1%

Not valuable

11.1%

N/A

How would you characterize the instructor's knowledge of the subject?

Very broad, up-to-date

44.4%

33.3%

11.1%

Reasonably broad, accurate, up-to-date

11.1%

Seriously deficient, frequently inaccurate, out-of-date

N/A

How would you characterize the instructor's ability to present and explain the material?

Excellent

44.4%

11.1%

22.2%

Adequate

11.1%

Very poor

N/A

Does the instructor motivate student interest in the subject?

Arouses enthusiasm among students for the subject

44.4%

22.2%

Arouses fair amount of student interest in the subject

11.1%

Discourages student interest

N/A

How well does the instructor relate the course material to other fields?

Exceptionally

22.2%

33.3%

Adequately

11.1%

Poorly

N/A

Did the instructor encourage participation from the students?

Encourages participation and precisely answers questions

33.3%

11.1%

Adequately encourages participation

22.2%

11.1%

Does not encourage participation

N/A

Was the instructor accessible outside of class?

Easily accessible

66.7%

11.1%

Adequately accessible

22.2%

Seldom accessible

N/A

What was the instructor's attitude? How did he/she deal with you?

Extremely fair and impartial

66.7%

11.1%

Reasonably fair

11.1%

Unfair and disdainful

N/A

How well did the instructor conduct, plan and organize classes?

Exceptionally

44.4%

33.3%

Adequately

22.2%

Poorly

N/A

Were the instructors teaching methods effective?

Very helpful

44.4%

11.1%

Adequate

33.3%

11.1%

Confusing, inadequate

N/A

Would you recommend this course to another student?

Highly recommend

33.3%

11.1%

Possibly recommend

22.2%

Would not recommend

11.1%

22.2%

N/A

Would you take this instructor for another course?

Definitely

55.6%

11.1%

Possibly

22.2%

No

11.1%

N/A

Rate the teaching effectiveness of this instructor as compared to other faculty in the school.

Excellent

44.4%

11.1%

Fair

33.3%

11.1%

Poor

N/A

ISP 121: Quantitative Reasoning and Technological Literacy II

James Foster