GAM 392: Game Modification Workshop

Brian Schrank

Fall 16-17 Section 401
Showing 7 responses
The course objectives were clearly defined:
Strongly agree
 
14.3%
Agree
 
42.9%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
28.6%
Disagree
 
14.3%
Strongly disagree
 
The course objectives were met:
Strongly agree
 
14.3%
Agree
 
57.1%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
14.3%
Disagree
 
14.3%
Strongly disagree
 
The course material was presented in an organized manner:
Strongly agree
 
14.3%
Agree
 
28.6%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
42.9%
Disagree
 
Strongly disagree
 
14.3%
I found the course material to be:
Among the most challenging
 
14.3%
More challenging than many courses
 
42.9%
About as challenging as other courses
 
42.9%
Less challenging than other courses
 
Among the least challenging
 
The amount of work I performed outside scheduled class time was:
Too much
 
14.3%
A little too much
 
About right
 
85.7%
Not quite enough
 
Not enough
 
The textbook for this course was appropriate and helpful:
Strongly agree
 
Agree
 
Neither agree nor disagree
 
Disagree
 
Strongly disagree
 
N/A
 
100%
Supplementary reading for this course was appropriate and helpful:
Strongly agree
 
42.9%
Agree
 
14.3%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
14.3%
Disagree
 
14.3%
Strongly disagree
 
N/A
 
14.3%
The assignments for this course contributed effectively to my overall learning experience:
Strongly agree
 
28.6%
Agree
 
28.6%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
28.6%
Disagree
 
Strongly disagree
 
14.3%
Homework and exams were graded fairly:
Strongly agree
 
Agree
 
14.3%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
71.4%
Disagree
 
Strongly disagree
 
14.3%
Homework and exams were graded in reasonable time:
Strongly agree
 
Agree
 
14.3%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
42.9%
Disagree
 
28.6%
Strongly disagree
 
14.3%
The instructor's feedback on student work was appropriate and constructive:
Strongly agree
 
28.6%
Agree
 
28.6%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
14.3%
Disagree
 
28.6%
Strongly disagree
 
I found this course was valuable for my career development:
Strongly agree
 
57.1%
Agree
 
14.3%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
Disagree
 
14.3%
Strongly disagree
 
14.3%
Overall, this course increased my knowledge or skills:
More than almost all other courses
 
More than many courses
 
57.1%
About the same as other courses
 
Less than many courses
 
28.6%
Less than almost all other courses
 
14.3%
I found the instructor's ability to present and explain the material to be:
Among the best
 
28.6%
Better than average
 
About average
 
57.1%
Worse than average
 
14.3%
Among the worst
 
The instructor's knowledge of the subject was relevant and up-to-date:
Strongly agree
 
42.9%
Agree
 
28.6%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
28.6%
Disagree
 
Strongly disagree
 
Course material was presented at a pace that was:
Too slow
 
A little too slow
 
About right
 
85.7%
A little too fast
 
Too fast
 
14.3%
The instructor stimulated interest in the subject:
Almost always
 
42.9%
Most of the time
 
14.3%
About half of the time
 
14.3%
Some of the time
 
14.3%
Almost never
 
14.3%
When appropriate, the instructor encouraged participation from the students:
Strongly agree
 
57.1%
Agree
 
14.3%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
Disagree
 
14.3%
Strongly disagree
 
N/A
 
14.3%
The instructor's attitude towards students was fair and impartial:
Strongly agree
 
14.3%
Agree
 
28.6%
Neither agree nor disagree
 
14.3%
Disagree
 
28.6%
Strongly disagree
 
14.3%
I found the accessibility of the instructor outside of scheduled class time to be:
Among the best
 
14.3%
Better than average
 
14.3%
About average
 
Worse than average
 
Among the worst
 
N/A
 
71.4%
Given your experience at DePaul, rate the instructor's overall teaching effectiveness:
Among the best
 
Better than average
 
57.1%
About average
 
14.3%
Worse than average
 
14.3%
Among the worst
 
14.3%
Given your experience at DePaul, rate the overall quality of the course:
Among the best
 
Better than average
 
57.1%
About average
 
28.6%
Worse than average
 
Among the worst
 
14.3%