ANI 206-802 Winter 07-08: Class Evaluation

Was this course well organized?

Exceptionally organized

18.2%

Adequately organized

18.2%

9.1%

18.2%

Very poorly organized

9.1%

18.2%

N/A

Do you feel the course objectives were accomplished?

Closely follows objectives

9.1%

18.2%

Adequate attention to objectives

18.2%

9.1%

Little attention to objectives

18.2%

9.1%

N/A

The amount of work you performed outside of this course was:

Too much

9.1%

Adequate

18.2%

9.1%

18.2%

Quite small

18.2%

9.1%

N/A

How difficult was the course material?

Challenging

9.1%

Moderately difficult

9.1%

18.2%

27.3%

Too easy

9.1%

N/A

The textbook for this course was:

Appropriate, interesting, significantly enhanced my understanding

9.1%

27.3%

18.2%

Moderately helpful, somewhat interesting, increased my understanding

18.2%

27.3%

Inappropriate and little help

N/A

Supplementary reading for this course was:

Appropriate helpful

9.1%

18.2%

Moderately helpful

18.2%

9.1%

36.4%

9.1%

Inappropriate, dull little help in learning what was required for the course

N/A

The assignments for the course were:

Fair, impartial, based on sufficient evidence

9.1%

Reasonably fair, based on adequate evidence

9.1%

36.4%

18.2%

Confusing, often made late, no relation to class work

9.1%

N/A

The grading of homework and exams in this course was:

Fair, impartial, based on sufficient evidence

9.1%

Reasonably fair, based on adequate evidence

9.1%

45.5%

18.2%

Frequently partial and unfair, little evidence to justify grade

N/A

What is your overall estimate of this course?

One of the most interesting, informative, useful, personally helpful course

9.1%

Average in interest, usefulness, etc.

18.2%

27.3%

9.1%

One of the least interesting, uninformative, unuseful, personally unhelpful course

9.1%

N/A

How valuable was this course in terms of your technical development?

Extremely valuable

9.1%

Reasonably valuable

18.2%

36.4%

18.2%

Not valuable

9.1%

N/A

How would you characterize the instructor's knowledge of the subject?

Very broad, up-to-date

18.2%

9.1%

Reasonably broad, accurate, up-to-date

18.2%

9.1%

Seriously deficient, frequently inaccurate, out-of-date

9.1%

N/A

How would you characterize the instructor's ability to present and explain the material?

Excellent

9.1%

18.2%

Adequate

9.1%

27.3%

Very poor

18.2%

9.1%

N/A

Does the instructor motivate student interest in the subject?

Arouses enthusiasm among students for the subject

9.1%

Arouses fair amount of student interest in the subject

27.3%

9.1%

18.2%

Discourages student interest

18.2%

9.1%

N/A

How well does the instructor relate the course material to other fields?

Exceptionally

9.1%

Adequately

36.4%

9.1%

18.2%

Poorly

18.2%

9.1%

N/A

Did the instructor encourage participation from the students?

Encourages participation and precisely answers questions

18.2%

Adequately encourages participation

18.2%

Does not encourage participation

9.1%

18.2%

N/A

Was the instructor accessible outside of class?

Easily accessible

9.1%

Adequately accessible

9.1%

45.5%

Seldom accessible

18.2%

N/A

What was the instructor's attitude? How did he/she deal with you?

Extremely fair and impartial

18.2%

9.1%

36.4%

Reasonably fair

9.1%

18.2%

Unfair and disdainful

9.1%

N/A

How well did the instructor conduct, plan and organize classes?

Exceptionally

9.1%

27.3%

Adequately

9.1%

18.2%

Poorly

27.3%

9.1%

N/A

Were the instructors teaching methods effective?

Very helpful

9.1%

27.3%

Adequate

9.1%

Confusing, inadequate

27.3%

N/A

Would you recommend this course to another student?

Highly recommend

9.1%

18.2%

Possibly recommend

36.4%

9.1%

Would not recommend

9.1%

N/A

Would you take this instructor for another course?

Definitely

9.1%

Possibly

18.2%

27.3%

9.1%

No

9.1%

N/A

Rate the teaching effectiveness of this instructor as compared to other faculty in the school.

Excellent

9.1%

27.3%

Fair

9.1%

18.2%

Poor

9.1%

18.2%

N/A

ANI 206: History of Animation

Paloma Trecka